Courtesy of Google Images
As Spring is now in full bloom and summer rounds the bend Ringling Bros. Barnum and Bailey Circus is fast approaching my home state of Connecticut and many other places around where most of you live. I have been actively protesting Ringling Bros. Circus for over a decade now. Cruelty towards animals has always been something that has deeply troubled me ever since I became fully aware of their sentient nature and plight after reading Peter Singer's book, Animal Liberation.
I have re-written this post several times using different angles to try to express the reasons why purchasing a ticket for Ringling Bros. supports cruelty. I think, when it comes down to it, I will say what's on my heart and then merely share a link that if accessed will reveal all of the citations made against Ringling Bros. by the United Stated Department of Agriculture as well as a short video that shows under cover footage of how Ringling Bros. trains baby elephants as well as testimony from veterinarians. I believe even if you skip out on all that I write and go directly to the resources, that the facts speak for themselves.
During the past few days I've reflected over how sometimes taking a stand in our seemingly "everything is relative" world is unpopular yet justified. Particularly when it has to do with taking the position that the well-being of other sentient beings, whether human or non-human, trumps over our own desire to be entertained. I've thought about the countless times I've protested and handed out literature, talking with circus-goers who have oftentimes become defensive, even rude. People that have been openly offended that I criticize their choice of recreation. Honestly, most times I'm there for the purpose of hopefully educating those that aren't aware of the abuse that happens. Those that are aware and still attend have my sympathies.
Who am I to say going to the circus is wrong? Well, I suppose I could turn that around and ask those who go year after year why they think it is so right? Why they think a couple of hours in a crowded colosseum or under a tent is worth a lifetime of misery and suffering, both physically and emotionally, for not just one living creature but many.
The undisputed fact is that animals are suffering for people's cheap thrills.
One of the most common responses I get from people that walk into
the circus is, "I know , I know it's wrong...I know what happens, but I
went as a child, so it's only fair. I can't ruin it for my children!".
In the name of tradition many keep coming back, year after year. I must
ask this though: Are all traditions worth continuing on to the next
generation? I can see many traditions and worldviews that have been
confronted and have been largely discarded much to the benefit of humanity.
Slavery, the oppression of women, carelessness towards the environment and so many others.
We humans have a
tendency to oppress those who have the least ability to communicate for our own personal and group ambitions-the
poor, the elderly, the young, the non-human. Slowly societies are evolving to
become more compassionate society; encompassing more and more of mankind under the umbrella
of consideration as our morals evolve. Moving from being egocentric (only concerned for oneself) to ethnocentric (being concerned for one's community/country) to worldcentric view (considering the well being of everyone).
We've made great strides in recognizing the fact that all humans deserve a life where their well-being is respected and not imposed upon. Can we not extend this favor to other sentient creatures that have scientifically been proven to also feel pain and that have similar capacities to suffer? Can our morals catch up with what science is teaching us is true? Or will our selfishness makes us blind to these truths?
How long will so many continue to look away and not recognize the suffering of the elephants are that separated from their mothers as babies only to be subjected to torture? To have each limb tied and stretched out, held apart by stakes, while being beaten with bullhooks so that their spirits are eventually broken in order that they will be compliant to learn to perform in circuses like Ringling. To the tigers, so magnificent in the wild, degraded and stripped of all dignity, whipped and shocked electrically in order to comply so that we may be entertained? Do they not deserve to live better lives?
When considering the rights that other sentient creatures have to not be subjected to such torture, philosopher Jeremy Bentham asked this question:
"The question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?"
Yes they can! And they do! Countless animal behaviorists, veterinarians and wildlife educators have agreed that the animals Ringling Bros. and other circuses use-elephants, tigers, bears, etc. do indeed have the capacity to suffer. And they only still suffer in circuses because people still support the industry that causes them to cry out in pain, to bleed, to collapse in exhaustion and dehydration.
We've made great strides in recognizing the fact that all humans deserve a life where their well-being is respected and not imposed upon. Can we not extend this favor to other sentient creatures that have scientifically been proven to also feel pain and that have similar capacities to suffer? Can our morals catch up with what science is teaching us is true? Or will our selfishness makes us blind to these truths?
How long will so many continue to look away and not recognize the suffering of the elephants are that separated from their mothers as babies only to be subjected to torture? To have each limb tied and stretched out, held apart by stakes, while being beaten with bullhooks so that their spirits are eventually broken in order that they will be compliant to learn to perform in circuses like Ringling. To the tigers, so magnificent in the wild, degraded and stripped of all dignity, whipped and shocked electrically in order to comply so that we may be entertained? Do they not deserve to live better lives?
When considering the rights that other sentient creatures have to not be subjected to such torture, philosopher Jeremy Bentham asked this question:
"The question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer?"
Yes they can! And they do! Countless animal behaviorists, veterinarians and wildlife educators have agreed that the animals Ringling Bros. and other circuses use-elephants, tigers, bears, etc. do indeed have the capacity to suffer. And they only still suffer in circuses because people still support the industry that causes them to cry out in pain, to bleed, to collapse in exhaustion and dehydration.
Others walking into the circus use the argument that they are there to educate their children. I can assure all parents everywhere that my children have never
attended the circus and don't seem to be any worse off for it! In fact,
they have cultivated a beautiful compassion towards animals and others
and an appreciation of learning about nature, in nature- not out of
nature in an artificial setting where they are taught to do artificial
acts. The excuse that the Ringling Bros. educates children is a lame attempt at clinging to an outdated tradition that has existed for far too long.
After reading how Ringling Bros. treats their animals and the violations that they have been found guilty of by the United States Department of Agriculture, I hope you will think twice of attending a Ringling Bros. show if you were planning on doing so. After all, it is a beautiful time of year and most people in this country are feeling economic pressures. Why not take a nice family hike in your local state forest or park and allow your children to see animals in their natural habitat while breathing in priceless fresh air? It's free! Rather than overpay for parking fees and tickets and be stuck paying for overpriced souvenirs that are cheap and break soon after you buy them anyway? Oh, and there's always the fact that besides leaving the circus with a lighter wallet you will also leave having promoted cruelty, whether you admit it or not
In all my years of protesting I've seen some bright rays of hope and evidence that people, when merely given the facts, will make the more compassionate decision.There has been cases while handing out literature and explaining to people the facts regarding Ringling Bros. where they have abruptly decided to leave and not purchase a ticket. After talking to two parents I even had the experience of them not only deciding to not attend but to hold signs with their children for awhile in protest after they learned of the abuse that takes place. I'd like to believe that there's something within us all that is repelled by brutality, abhorred by suffering and that simply won't tolerate it if informed that we are somehow supporting it.
Please check out the link below to read all the citations against Ringling Bros. made by the USDA. The list was compiled by PETA. Normally at protests I don't use literature by PETA because I don't always agree with all the stances they take. But I do agree with them on this one issue and they know how to do their research!
http://www.mediapeta.com/peta/PDF/RinglingFactsheet.pdf
Please take the time to watch this video especially if you are unconvinced and still plan on attending a show. It's just under four minutes!
Thoughts are always appreciated! Please leave them in the comments section! Thank you!
